When Is a Child’s Forensic Statement Deemed Credible? A Comparison of Physical and Sexual Abuse Cases

Irit Hershkowitz, Eran P. Melkman, Ronit Zur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A large national sample of 4,775 reports of child physical and sexual abuse made in Israel in 2014 was analyzed in order to examine whether assessments of credibility would vary according to abuse type, physical or sexual, and whether child and event characteristics contributing to the probability that reports of abuse would be determined as credible would be similar or different in child physical abuse (CPA) and child sexual abuse (CSA) cases. Results revealed that CPA reports were less likely to be viewed as credible (41.9%) compared to CSA reports (56.7%). Multigroup path analysis, however, indicated equivalence in predicting factors. In a unified model for both types of abuse, salient predictors of a credible judgment were older age, lack of a cognitive delay, and the alleged abusive event being a onetime less severe act. Over and beyond the effects of these factors, abuse type significantly contributed to the prediction of credibility judgments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-206
Number of pages11
JournalChild Maltreatment
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.

Keywords

  • child physical abuse
  • child sexual abuse
  • credibility assessment
  • forensic evaluation
  • professional judgments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Is a Child’s Forensic Statement Deemed Credible? A Comparison of Physical and Sexual Abuse Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this