Abstract
In the third chapter of LOT 2—"LOT Meets Frege's Problem (Among Others)"—Jerry Fodor argues that LOT (the language-of-thought hypothesis) provides a solution to "Frege's Problem," as well as to Kripke's Paderewski puzzle (Fodor, LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008). I argue that most of what Fodor says in his discussion of Frege's problem is mistaken.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 467-476 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Erkenntnis |
Volume | 80 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Apr 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Keywords
- Belief
- Fodor
- Frege
- Kripke
- Language of thought
- Paderewski
- Pragmatics
- Propositional attitudes
- Substitution failure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Logic