When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management

Irit Hadar; Anna Zamansky

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11

When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management

Irit Hadar, Anna Zamansky

Department of Information Systems

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

The acceptance and correct use of new paradigms in information systems engineering is highly affected by cognitive dispositions of the individual engineers. In particular, the engineers’ intuition–based on their vast experience–may come in the way of accepting the rationale of a new paradigm. Analyzing engineers’ reaction to a newly introduced paradigm through the lens of cognitive psychology may highlight potential barriers to the paradigms’ successful adoption and use. In this position paper we demonstrate the potential benefit of the above-proposed approach via a case study focusing on the paradigm of inconsistency management. We present our findings, based on in-depth interviews with 20 practitioners, and analyze them using the dual-process theory, highlighting a clear clash between their intuition and the paradigm’s rationale.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings
Editors	Anne Persson, Janis Stirna
Publisher	Springer Verlag
Pages	107-113
Number of pages	7
ISBN (Electronic)	9783319192420
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11
State	Published - 2015
Event	2nd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design based on the Notion of Capabiliy, ASDENCA 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering, COGNISE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Digital Business Innovation and the Future Enterprise Information Systems Engineering, DiFenSE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling, EM 2015, 1st Workshop on the Role of Real-World Objects in Business Process Management Systems, RW-BPMS 2015, 10th International Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Researc, TEAR 2015 and 5th International Workshop on Information Systems Security Engineering, WISSE 2015 held in conjunction with 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2015 - Stockholm, Sweden Duration: 8 Jun 2015 → 9 Jun 2015

Publication series

Name	Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Volume	215
ISSN (Print)	1865-1348

Conference

Conference	2nd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design based on the Notion of Capabiliy, ASDENCA 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering, COGNISE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Digital Business Innovation and the Future Enterprise Information Systems Engineering, DiFenSE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling, EM 2015, 1st Workshop on the Role of Real-World Objects in Business Process Management Systems, RW-BPMS 2015, 10th International Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Researc, TEAR 2015 and 5th International Workshop on Information Systems Security Engineering, WISSE 2015 held in conjunction with 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2015
Country/Territory	Sweden
City	Stockholm
Period	8/06/15 → 9/06/15

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

Keywords

Cognitive processes
Dual-process theory
Inconsistency management
Paradigm acceptance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Management Information Systems
Control and Systems Engineering
Business and International Management
Information Systems
Modeling and Simulation
Information Systems and Management

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11

Cite this

Hadar, I., & Zamansky, A. (2015). When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management. In A. Persson, & J. Stirna (Eds.), Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings (pp. 107-113). (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Vol. 215). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11

@inproceedings{f56f7a62a00b49ad841edad2d4f8cc52,

title = "When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management",

abstract = "The acceptance and correct use of new paradigms in information systems engineering is highly affected by cognitive dispositions of the individual engineers. In particular, the engineers{\textquoteright} intuition–based on their vast experience–may come in the way of accepting the rationale of a new paradigm. Analyzing engineers{\textquoteright} reaction to a newly introduced paradigm through the lens of cognitive psychology may highlight potential barriers to the paradigms{\textquoteright} successful adoption and use. In this position paper we demonstrate the potential benefit of the above-proposed approach via a case study focusing on the paradigm of inconsistency management. We present our findings, based on in-depth interviews with 20 practitioners, and analyze them using the dual-process theory, highlighting a clear clash between their intuition and the paradigm{\textquoteright}s rationale.",

keywords = "Cognitive processes, Dual-process theory, Inconsistency management, Paradigm acceptance",

author = "Irit Hadar and Anna Zamansky",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.; 2nd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design based on the Notion of Capabiliy, ASDENCA 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering, COGNISE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Digital Business Innovation and the Future Enterprise Information Systems Engineering, DiFenSE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling, EM 2015, 1st Workshop on the Role of Real-World Objects in Business Process Management Systems, RW-BPMS 2015, 10th International Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Researc, TEAR 2015 and 5th International Workshop on Information Systems Security Engineering, WISSE 2015 held in conjunction with 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2015 ; Conference date: 08-06-2015 Through 09-06-2015",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11",

language = "English",

series = "Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

pages = "107--113",

editor = "Anne Persson and Janis Stirna",

booktitle = "Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings",

address = "Germany",

}

Hadar, I & Zamansky, A 2015, When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management. in A Persson & J Stirna (eds), Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 215, Springer Verlag, pp. 107-113, 2nd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design based on the Notion of Capabiliy, ASDENCA 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering, COGNISE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Digital Business Innovation and the Future Enterprise Information Systems Engineering, DiFenSE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling, EM 2015, 1st Workshop on the Role of Real-World Objects in Business Process Management Systems, RW-BPMS 2015, 10th International Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Researc, TEAR 2015 and 5th International Workshop on Information Systems Security Engineering, WISSE 2015 held in conjunction with 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2015, Stockholm, Sweden, 8/06/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11

When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management. / Hadar, Irit ; Zamansky, Anna.
Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings. ed. / Anne Persson; Janis Stirna. Springer Verlag, 2015. p. 107-113 (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Vol. 215).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition

T2 - 2nd International Workshop on Advances in Services Design based on the Notion of Capabiliy, ASDENCA 2015, 3rd International Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Information Systems Engineering, COGNISE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Digital Business Innovation and the Future Enterprise Information Systems Engineering, DiFenSE 2015, 1st International Workshop on Enterprise Modeling, EM 2015, 1st Workshop on the Role of Real-World Objects in Business Process Management Systems, RW-BPMS 2015, 10th International Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Researc, TEAR 2015 and 5th International Workshop on Information Systems Security Engineering, WISSE 2015 held in conjunction with 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2015

AU - Hadar, Irit

AU - Zamansky, Anna

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The acceptance and correct use of new paradigms in information systems engineering is highly affected by cognitive dispositions of the individual engineers. In particular, the engineers’ intuition–based on their vast experience–may come in the way of accepting the rationale of a new paradigm. Analyzing engineers’ reaction to a newly introduced paradigm through the lens of cognitive psychology may highlight potential barriers to the paradigms’ successful adoption and use. In this position paper we demonstrate the potential benefit of the above-proposed approach via a case study focusing on the paradigm of inconsistency management. We present our findings, based on in-depth interviews with 20 practitioners, and analyze them using the dual-process theory, highlighting a clear clash between their intuition and the paradigm’s rationale.

AB - The acceptance and correct use of new paradigms in information systems engineering is highly affected by cognitive dispositions of the individual engineers. In particular, the engineers’ intuition–based on their vast experience–may come in the way of accepting the rationale of a new paradigm. Analyzing engineers’ reaction to a newly introduced paradigm through the lens of cognitive psychology may highlight potential barriers to the paradigms’ successful adoption and use. In this position paper we demonstrate the potential benefit of the above-proposed approach via a case study focusing on the paradigm of inconsistency management. We present our findings, based on in-depth interviews with 20 practitioners, and analyze them using the dual-process theory, highlighting a clear clash between their intuition and the paradigm’s rationale.

KW - Cognitive processes

KW - Dual-process theory

KW - Inconsistency management

KW - Paradigm acceptance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937416406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-19243-7_11

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84937416406

T3 - Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

SP - 107

EP - 113

BT - Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops - CAiSE 2015 International Workshops, Proceedings

A2 - Persson, Anne

A2 - Stirna, Janis

PB - Springer Verlag

Y2 - 8 June 2015 through 9 June 2015

ER -

When a paradigm is inconsistent with intuition: The case of inconsistency management

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this