Abstract
This qualitative study examines mentors' interpretations of their practice as revealed through writing and discussing their cases in a university postgraduate course in Israel. The data were examined for emergent features of the practice of in-service mentoring in the Jewish and Arab sectors within the Israeli school system. Content analysis of the cases and of the discussions that followed their presentation in class revealed a unique 'discourse of mentoring' or 'language of practice' that reflected mentors' concerns over issues of accountability and boundaries of roles in their practice. From a programmatic perspective, the study reveals that a university teacher-education course based on case-method pedagogy constitutes a safe and challenging context for mentors to voice dilemmas inherent in their field experiences that are often silenced by the system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 451-468 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Journal of Curriculum Studies |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What's in a case? What mentors' cases reveal about the practice of mentoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver