Abstract
Against the background of two U.S. Supreme Court cases in 2005 on the question of the public display of the Ten Commandments in the context of the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution, the article addresses the way the lawyers, especially the judges, discussed the status of the Ten Commandments as a text and as a symbol. The article relates to the legal arguments concerning such religious texts, and the ways in which decisions in favor of the public display of apparently religious symbols may be distinguished from decisions against their display. While many of the judges did not distinguish between text and symbol, those that did tackled these issues 'semiotically' - without using technical terminology.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-297 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Semiotica |
| Volume | 172 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Law
- Religion
- Symbol
- Ten Commandments
- Text
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Literature and Literary Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What do the ten commandments do? A study of lawyers' semiotics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver