Abstract
Our study explores the effect of market volatility expectations, captured by the implied volatility index (VIX), aka "investors' fear gauge," on investors' reactions to analyst recommendation revisions. We find that positive (negative) excess returns following recommendation upgrades (downgrades) are stronger when accompanied by daily VIX decreases (increases). A rational explanation for the effect may be due to VIX serving as an indicator of future economic conditions. Noting, however, that the VIX effect is detected on excess daily stock returns is suggestive that the results are driven by more than mere changes in investors' expectations of economic fundamentals. We suggest, therefore, that investors' mood, as reflected by VIX changes, mediates their reactions to analyst recommendation revisions, to wit, investors in good (bad) mood perceive positive (negative) future financial outcomes as more probable (whether indicative of future occurrences or not) and react more strongly to analyst recommendation upgrades (downgrades).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Psychology |
Volume | 37 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2013 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The financial support of the Zimmerman Foundation for the study of Banking and Finance at the University of Haifa is gratefully acknowledged.
Keywords
- Analyst recommendation revisions
- Behavioral finance
- Investors' fear gauge
- Market sentiment
- VIX
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics