Abstract
In the first part of the paper, I challenge some basic assumptions underlying the claim that reading is the major source of vocabulary acquisition in L2: the 'noticing' assumption, the 'guessing ability' assumption, the 'guessing-retention link' assumption, and the 'cumulative gain' assumption. In the second part, I report on three experiments in which vocabulary gains from reading were compared with gains from word-focused tasks: completing given sentences, writing original sentences, and incorporating words in a composition. Results showed that more words were acquired through tasks than through reading.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 567-587 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Canadian Modern Language Review |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2003 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: Do Learners Really Acquire Most Vocabulary by Reading? Some Empirical Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver