Abstract
In the first part of the paper, I challenge some basic assumptions underlying the claim that reading is the major source of vocabulary acquisition in L2: the ʼnoticing’ assumption, the ‘guessing ability’ assumption, the ‘guessing-retention link’ assumption, and the ‘cumulative gain’ assumption. In the second part, I report on three experiments in which vocabulary gains from reading were compared with gains from word-focused tasks: completing given sentences, writing original sentences, and incorporating words in a composition. Results showed that more words were acquired through tasks than through reading.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Vocabu Lary |
| Subtitle of host publication | Critical Concepts in Linguistics: Volume III |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 241-258 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Volume | 3 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781040898345 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781138838635 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Stuart Webb.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver