Abstract
In the first part of the paper, I challenge some basic assumptions underlying the claim that reading is the major source of vocabulary acquisition in L2: the 'noticing' assumption, the 'guessing ability' assumption, the 'guessing-retention link' assumption, and the 'cumulative gain' assumption. In the second part, I report on three experiments in which vocabulary gains from reading were compared with gains from word-focused tasks: completing given sentences, writing original sentences, and incorporating words in a composition. Results showed that more words were acquired through tasks than through reading.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 567-587 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Canadian Modern Language Review |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Linguistics and Language