Abstract
Technological advancements in the past decade have transformed personnel selection processes. This study compares the psychometric properties of virtual assessment centres (VACs) and face-to-face assessment centres (FTF-ACs). The study reports the findings of a field study involving 10,898 candidates participating in a selection process for military positions through either an FTF-AC or a VAC. The study finds that the two ACs appeared to capture the measured capabilities in a different manner. However, the measured capabilities in two ACs are related similarly to other variables, and there is good reliability between assessors in VACs. For most dimensions, the reliability in the VAC was similar to that in the FTF-AC. However, performance ratings in the VAC were significantly higher than those in the FTF-AC. This is the first study that compares the psychometric properties of a VAC and an FTF-AC. The results provide initial support for organizations’ use of VACs in personnel selection. Nonetheless, further research is needed to validate the effectiveness of VACs and to understand their limitations. The article also includes recommendations for future research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- digital selection procedures
- reliability
- Virtual assessment centre
- virtual group exercise
- virtual role-playing exercise
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management