Urban climate policy and action through a health lens—an untapped opportunity

Audrey de Nazelle, Charlotte J. Roscoe, Aina Roca-Barcelό, Giselle Sebag, Gudrun Weinmayr, Carlos Dora, Kristie L. Ebi, Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Maya Negev

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Debate

Abstract

Motivated by a growing recognition of the climate emergency, reflected in the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP26), we outline untapped opportunities to improve health through ambitious climate actions in cities. Health is a primary reason for climate action yet is rarely integrated in urban climate plans as a policy goal. This is a missed opportunity to create sustainable alliances across sectors and groups, to engage a broad set of stakeholders, and to develop structural health promotion. In this statement, we first briefly review the literature on health co-benefits of urban climate change strategies and make the case for health-promoting climate action; we then describe barriers to integrating health in climate action. We found that the evidence-base is often insufficiently policy-relevant to be impactful. Research rarely integrates the complexity of real-world systems, including multiple and dynamic impacts of strategies, and consideration of how decision-making processes contend with competing interests and short-term electoral cycles. Due to siloed-thinking and restrictive funding opportunities, research often falls short of the type of evidence that would be most useful for decision-making, and research outputs can be cryptic to decision makers. As a way forward, we urge researchers and stakeholders to engage in co-production and systems thinking approaches. Partnering across sectors and disciplines is urgently needed so pathways to climate change mitigation and adaptation fully embrace their health-promoting potential and engage society towards the huge transformations needed. This commentary is endorsed by the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE) and the International Society for Urban Health (ISUH) and accompanies a sister statement oriented towards stakeholders (published on the societies’ websites).

Original languageEnglish
Article number12516
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume18
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
To embrace real-world complexity and ensure the relevance of their work, researchers must integrate a broad variety of collaborators throughout the research process, including those from different academic disciplines, community-based organizations, the private sector, and government. This transition to a comprehensive research framework needs to be supported by the funding landscape. A range of expertise and real-world experience are necessary to inform each step of research, from conception to dissemination. It is important to integrate perspectives from those involved in the decision-making process, as well as those who study these processes and those impacted by policies, into the design and translation of research. The Wales HIA Support Unit is an example of the infrastructure and platforms required for such integration; it provides accessible information, training, resources and guidance for researchers, policy makers, and community members, who may be interested in the HIA process [42].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Cities
  • Climate change
  • Co-benefits
  • Co-production
  • Systems thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Urban climate policy and action through a health lens—an untapped opportunity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this