Unlocking Scholarly Realms: Revealing Discipline-Specific Publication and Citation Benefits in Open Access

Shlomit Hadad, Noa Aharony, Daphne R. Raban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis examines research publications from Israel, Austria, and Mexico (2010–2020) using Scopus data. The selection of Austria and Mexico as comparators to Israel was based on SCImago rankings. Top four disciplines were chosen for Health, Physical, and Life Sciences (HPL) and Social and Humanities Sciences (SSH). The findings indicate a distinct preference for closed-access publications; however, a clear ‘open access citation advantage’ emerges nonetheless. Notably, Israel has the lowest SSH publications in open access, yet the highest in closed access. Conversely, open-access HPL publications receive more citations than closed access across all countries. Despite fewer open-access articles, Israel's HPL research surpasses Austria in citations. In SSH, Israel, and Austria's open-access articles attract more citations, while Mexico shows no significant difference. These findings provide insights into publication dynamics, disciplinary influences, and citation patterns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)925-927
Number of pages3
JournalProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
87 Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science & Technology | Oct. 25 – 29, 2024 | Calgary, AB, Canada.

Keywords

  • and Life Sciences (HPL)
  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Comparative study
  • Health
  • Open-Access (OA) publication
  • Physical
  • Social and Humanities Sciences (SSH)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science
  • Library and Information Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unlocking Scholarly Realms: Revealing Discipline-Specific Publication and Citation Benefits in Open Access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this