Abstract
This article contributes to the growing body of research on administrative burdens by providing a theoretically and empirically driven typology of governments' burden reduction strategies. Despite the mounting interest in burden reduction, the literature still lacks a typology for systematically identifying and classifying such strategies. The article identifies three analytical dimensions of burden reduction: distributive (who bears the burden), intensiveness (what the level of burden is), and relational (how burden is experienced in bureaucratic encounters). Based on these dimensions, and drawing on a systematic analysis of the case of social security in Israel, we identify, define, and characterize seven distinct strategies of burden reduction: shifting, sharing, discarding, simplifying, expediting, communicating, and respecting. The article concludes with a discussion of these strategies, their applicability, practical implications, and directions for the research agenda on burden reduction.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 349-358 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jul 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s).
Keywords
- Israel
- administrative burden
- administrative burden reduction
- bureaucratic encounters
- social security
- take-up
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Marketing