Abstract
This article presents an economic, hydrological, dynamic optimization model, which describes the negative external effects of nitrogen fertilizers on groundwater quality. The relative merits of treatment versus prevention of nitrogen pollution were analyzed. A dynamical water and nitrogen flow between land surface, the unsaturated zone, and groundwater was employed. A specific treatment technology, which gives rise to a discontinuous cost function, was also used. Applying the model to the coastal aquifer in Israel, our results showed that in a joint (agricultural and domestic) water source area that supplies a relatively small quantity of drinking water, it is more efficient to combine a policy that imposes restrictions on the use of nitrogen with a drinking-water treatment process. However, when a relatively large quantity of drinking water is involved, imposing restrictions on the use of nitrogen only is more efficient. The paper, thus, is useful to planners of fast growing urban population centers with regard to regulation and can be used to calculate and evaluate specific policies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 137-171 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Natural Resource Modeling |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- Groundwater contamination
- Nitrate
- Pollution control
- Pollution prevention
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Modeling and Simulation
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment versus prevention of nitrogen fertilizer pollution: An inter-sectoral externality policy model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver