Abstract
Purpose: A single-subject alternating treatment design was used to (a) evaluate the influence of translucency (i.e., the guessability of the symbol when the referent is known) and complexity (i.e., the number of lines or strokes that compose the symbol) on Blissymbol acquisition and (b) compare the effectiveness of computer-based instruction (CBI) and traditional teacher-based instruction (TBI) on students' accuracy in identifying Blissymbols. Method: Three students with communication disorders were taught to identify 40 Blissymbols using the two instructional formats. Results: Findings revealed that high translucency Blissymbols were learned significantly faster than low translucency Blissymbols for all participants. High complexity assisted learning when translucency was high, but hindered learning when translucency was low. These results were evident in both interventions. Clinical implications: Both interventions were found to be effective instructional methods for teaching Blissymbols.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 291-303 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- AAC
- Blissymbols
- Complexity
- Computers
- Translucency
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Speech and Hearing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Translucency and complexity: Effects on Blissymbol learning using computer and teacher presentations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver