Abstract
Intensive longitudinal methods (ILMs), in which data are gathered from participants multiple times with short intervals (typically 24 hours or less apart), have gained considerable ground in personality research and may be useful in exploring causality in both classic personality trait models and more novel contextualized personality state models. We briefly review the various terms and uses of ILMs in various fields of psychology and present five main strategies that can help researchers infer causality in ILM studies. We discuss the use of temporal precedence to establish causality, through both lagged analyses and natural experiments; the use of external measures and peer reports to go beyond self-report data; delving deeper into repeated measures to derive new indices; the use of contextual factors occurring during the measurement period; and combining experimental methods and ILMs. These strategies are illustrated by examples from existing research and by new empirical findings from two dyadic daily diary studies (N = 80 and N = 108 couples) and an experience sampling method study of personality states (N = 52). We conclude by offering a short checklist for designing ILM studies with causality in mind and look at the applicability of these strategies in the intersection of personality psychology and other psychological research domains.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 269-285 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | European Journal of Personality |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 May 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2018 European Association of Personality Psychology
Keywords
- causality
- empirical methods
- experience sampling methods
- intensive longitudinal methods
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology