THE U.S. ADMINISTRATION IN TRANSITION AND THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF PRE-DISPUTE ARBITRATION

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Trump Presidency has halted significant changes in consumer rights that were introduced under President Obama’s term. The changes had to do with pre-arbitration dispute clauses in consumer contracts, clauses that required consumers, at the time of the consummation of the transaction, to submit all future disputes to arbitration and typically preclude the avenue of class actions. While the U.S. has traditionally upheld that clauses, the EU has taken a different path. The U.S. approach has significantly limited consumers’ access to justice, a problem that has become all the more acute in the digital age for two reasons. First, the prevalence of such clauses has increased in the age of e-commerce and online agreements. Second, these clauses constrained the spread of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) – convenient and inexpensive online avenues for the resolution of consumer disputes and have obstructed efforts to establish an international ODR scheme for cross-border consumer disputes. While the U.S. began to make steps towards the regulation of pre-dispute arbitration clauses, these efforts were stifled in the aftermath of the 2016 elections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-461
Number of pages15
JournalRevue Francaise d'Administration Publique
Volume170
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Institut national du service public. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.

Keywords

  • Consumer contracts
  • E-commerce
  • Online dispute resolution
  • Pre-dispute arbitration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE U.S. ADMINISTRATION IN TRANSITION AND THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF PRE-DISPUTE ARBITRATION'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this