Abstract
A popular explanation of the success of scientific theories is their contribution to practical needs of "society" in general, or of powerful groups within society. This article challenges this common explanation by showing how the practical contribution itself is socially constructed by competing scientists. The article describes the struggle of neoclassical economists and institutionalists in interwar America and shows how both groups attempted to demonstrate their larger capacity to solve contemporary economic problems. Arguments about the practical value of competing research programs, we maintain, are decided the same way that arguments about the truth value of competing theories are decided: by recruiting powerful and numerous allies and by tying the claims to solid and stable networks. It is suggested that similar trials of strength have taken place in other controversies in economics and other disciplines.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 311-342 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Social Science Information |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1997 |
Keywords
- Actor-network analysis
- History of economic thought
- Institutional economics
- Neoclassical economics
- Practical value
- Price theory
- Science and society
- Sociology of science
- Theory of value
- United States (1918-1939)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (all)
- Library and Information Sciences