Abstract
A novel argument for the existence of God is presented, based on demonstrating that prior to its puzzling emergence, the seven-day week was unimaginable, undesirable, and (socially) infeasible. Indeed, we argue that game theory reveals that the launch of a Sabbath-cycle, like the seven-day week initially was, cannot have occurred without extra-human support. The argument gains additional force by a) noting how the Pentateuch is an insightful “sociological witness” to the infeasibility of the Sabbath-cycle’s inauguration; b) integrating it with the (weaker, but complementary) Kuzari argument, on the infeasibility of propagating a false myth of mass revelation; c) considering two unattested possibilities—that a human king might legislate a Sabbath-cycle and that it might emerge via an iterated game; and d) noting theologically attractive features of the argument, including that the week’s spread means that a divine gift to one people became a blessing for humankind.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 185-213 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Faith and Philosophy |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 Society of Christian Philosophers. All rights reserved.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Religious studies
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'THE STRONG WEEK ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A (GIFT-BESTOWING, BIBLICAL) GOD'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver