The Role of Premagmatic Rifting in Shaping a Volcanic Continental Margin: An Example From the Eastern North American Margin

G. Lang, U. S. ten Brink, D. R. Hutchinson, G. S. Mountain, U. Schattner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Both magmatic and tectonic processes contribute to the formation of volcanic continental margins. Such margins are thought to undergo extension across a narrow zone of lithospheric thinning (~100 km). New observations based on existing and reprocessed data from the Eastern North American Margin contradict this hypothesis. With ~64,000 km of 2-D seismic data tied to 40 wells combined with published refraction, deep reflection, receiver function, and onshore drilling efforts, we quantified along-strike variations in the distribution of rift structures, magmatism, crustal thickness, and early post-rift sedimentation under the shelf of Baltimore Canyon Trough (BCT), Long Island Platform, and Georges Bank Basin (GBB). Results indicate that BCT is narrow (80–120 km) with a sharp basement hinge and few rift basins. The seaward dipping reflectors (SDR) there extend ~50 km seaward of the hinge line. In contrast, the GBB is wide (~200 km), has many syn-rift structures, and the SDR there extend ~200 km seaward of the hinge line. Early post-rift depocenters at the GBB coincide with thinner crust suggesting “uniform” thinning of the entire lithosphere. Models for the formation of volcanic margins do not explain the wide structure of the GBB. We argue that crustal thinning of the BCT was closely associated with late syn-rift magmatism, whereas the broad thinning of the GBB segment predated magmatism. Correlation of these variations to crustal terranes of different compositions suggests that the inherited rheology determined the premagmatic response of the lithosphere to extension.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2020JB019576
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Volume125
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Award DE-FE-0026087 to Battelle Memorial Institute under the “Mid-Atlantic U.S. Offshore Carbon Storage Resource Assessment” Project. We gratefully acknowledge discussions and data exchange with project leaders and participants Ken Miller, Dave Goldberg, Will Fortin, Kim Baldwin, Chris Lombardi, John Schmeltz, Leslie Jordan, Neeraj Gupta, Isis Fukai, Peter McLaughlin, and Mojisola KunleDare. Discussions with Martha Withjack, Or Bialik, and Mark Deptuck were useful in clarifying aspects of the tectonic development of the Atlantic margin. In addition, the authors would like to extend special thanks to Lindsay Worthington, Vadim Levin, and Daniel Lizarralde for providing data. We thank Tom Pratt, USGS, for his thorough internal review and Maryline Moulin, Graeme Eagles, and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments. The analysis was carried out with Schlumberger's Petrel interpretation software under academic licenses to the University of Haifa and to Rutgers University. Use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government.

Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Award DE‐FE‐0026087 to Battelle Memorial Institute under the “Mid‐Atlantic U.S. Offshore Carbon Storage Resource Assessment” Project. We gratefully acknowledge discussions and data exchange with project leaders and participants Ken Miller, Dave Goldberg, Will Fortin, Kim Baldwin, Chris Lombardi, John Schmeltz, Leslie Jordan, Neeraj Gupta, Isis Fukai, Peter McLaughlin, and Mojisola KunleDare. Discussions with Martha Withjack, Or Bialik, and Mark Deptuck were useful in clarifying aspects of the tectonic development of the Atlantic margin. In addition, the authors would like to extend special thanks to Lindsay Worthington, Vadim Levin, and Daniel Lizarralde for providing data. We thank Tom Pratt, USGS, for his thorough internal review and Maryline Moulin, Graeme Eagles, and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments. The analysis was carried out with Schlumberger's Petrel interpretation software under academic licenses to the University of Haifa and to Rutgers University. Use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government.

Publisher Copyright:
©2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Keywords

  • Central Atlantic
  • Eastern North American Margin
  • continental breakup
  • inherited rheology
  • lithosphere thinning
  • volcanic continental margin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Premagmatic Rifting in Shaping a Volcanic Continental Margin: An Example From the Eastern North American Margin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this