The right to parenthood: an argument for a narrow interpretation.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The paper argues for two kinds of limitations on the right of parenthood. First, it claims that the right to parenthood does not entail a right to have as many children as one desires. This conclusion follows from the standard justifications for the right to parenthood, none of which establishes the need to grant special protection to having as many children as one desires. Second, with respect to the right to receive assistance from the state in IVF, it is suggested that the state should also be allowed to take non-medical considerations into account in determining whether or not an applicant is entitled to this service, particularly in cases where the applicant seems to lack mothering ability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-235
Number of pages12
JournalEthical Perspectives
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'The right to parenthood: an argument for a narrow interpretation.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this