TY - JOUR
T1 - The right to parenthood
T2 - an argument for a narrow interpretation.
AU - Statman, Daniel
PY - 2003
Y1 - 2003
N2 - The paper argues for two kinds of limitations on the right of parenthood. First, it claims that the right to parenthood does not entail a right to have as many children as one desires. This conclusion follows from the standard justifications for the right to parenthood, none of which establishes the need to grant special protection to having as many children as one desires. Second, with respect to the right to receive assistance from the state in IVF, it is suggested that the state should also be allowed to take non-medical considerations into account in determining whether or not an applicant is entitled to this service, particularly in cases where the applicant seems to lack mothering ability.
AB - The paper argues for two kinds of limitations on the right of parenthood. First, it claims that the right to parenthood does not entail a right to have as many children as one desires. This conclusion follows from the standard justifications for the right to parenthood, none of which establishes the need to grant special protection to having as many children as one desires. Second, with respect to the right to receive assistance from the state in IVF, it is suggested that the state should also be allowed to take non-medical considerations into account in determining whether or not an applicant is entitled to this service, particularly in cases where the applicant seems to lack mothering ability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144538859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2143/EP.10.3.503888
DO - 10.2143/EP.10.3.503888
M3 - Article
C2 - 16206464
AN - SCOPUS:27144538859
SN - 1370-0049
VL - 10
SP - 224
EP - 235
JO - Ethical Perspectives
JF - Ethical Perspectives
IS - 3-4
ER -