Abstract
Regardless of the therapy modality, research continues to point to the therapeutic relationship as a major salient factor in clinical success or failure. When a patient is sexually abused by his or her therapist, this therapeutic relationship is cynically exploited in a way that does not properly serve the essential needs of the patient. When this patient then seeks reparative therapy, the subsequent therapist needs to pay close attention to issues of the relationship which were breached by the previous clinician. In this article, two case studies showing very different dynamics will be presented in order to demonstrate: (1) relevant factors related to transference, countertransference, projective identification, and the analytic third pertaining to the former, abusive therapy; and (2) needs versus wishes, and issues related to boundaries and self-disclosure in the corrective therapy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 303-331 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The relevance of psychodynamic psychotherapy to understanding therapist-patient sexual abuse and treatment of survivors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver