The prosecution of public figures and the separation of powers. Confusion within the executive branch - A conceptual framework

Anne Van Aaken, Eli Salzberger, Stefan Voigt

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Criminal investigation and prosecution of politicians, top civil servants and other public figures are topics frequently discussed in the media. The nature of the investigating or prosecuting authority varies between countries - from the general public prosecutor, through magistrates to independent counsels or parliamentary investigation commissions. This paper analyzes the role and status of public prosecutors within the separation of powers-concept. Prosecutors are usually part of the executive and not the judicial branch, which implies that they do not enjoy the same degree of independence as judges, and are ultimately subordinated to the directives of the minister of justice or the government. Conflicts of interest may hence arise if members of government can use the criminal process for their own or partisan interests. The incentives of public prosecutors in different jurisdictions are compared.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-280
Number of pages20
JournalConstitutional Political Economy
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Keywords

  • government offences
  • positive constitutional economics
  • public prosecution
  • separation of powers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The prosecution of public figures and the separation of powers. Confusion within the executive branch - A conceptual framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this