The problem of peaceful change revisited: From the end of the cold war to the uncertainties of a Post-Liberal Order

Arie M. Kacowicz, Benjamin Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the perennial problem of peaceful change (how to bring about a change in the status quo by means other than war?) by reflecting on the post-Cold War order from 1991 to 2017. We examine the problem at three different levels of analysis: systemic (great power interactions), interactive (peaceful territorial change), and domestic (democratization efforts). At the interactive level, we assess the record of successes and failures of peaceful territorial changes since 1991 to the present. At the systemic level, we assess the inherent difficulties embedded in systemic peaceful change (the decline of the US hegemony, the rise of China, the revival of Russia?). At the domestic level, we focus upon democratization efforts. In this context, we particularly emphasize the contours of the emerging illiberal international order in keeping peace and the status quo, bringing war, or facilitating the possibility of peaceful change. Finally, we suggest possible links between domestic, interactive, and systemic peaceful change, and suggest an agenda for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-308
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Illiberal international order
  • Peaceful change
  • Peaceful territorial change
  • Systemic peaceful change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The problem of peaceful change revisited: From the end of the cold war to the uncertainties of a Post-Liberal Order'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this