The moral judgment, action, and credibility of Israeli soldiers who refused to serve in Lebanon (1982-1985)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter describes three stages of analysis: first, the uniqueness of the Lebanon War and its moral complexity; second, the personal/moral characteristics of the Israeli soldiers who refused to serve in Lebanon; and, third, some thoughts on the credibility of the soldiers’ moral justifications for their actions. Most of the soldiers who were morally troubled by the prolongation of the war chose to express their objections as civilians upon their return from reserve service in Lebanon. Assuming that those remaining in the unit have a conscience also the primary question for consideration, quite before any attempt to assess the correctness of the objector’s mode of moral solution, is the credibility of his claim for moral superiority. At least within the Israeli reality of war, selective conscientious objectors should be given more credibility than the Unconditional Objectors who often take advantage of the social system, rather than pointing out its weak points that they are ready to correct.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSelective Conscientious Objection
Subtitle of host publicationAccommodating Conscience and Security
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages129-151
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9781000239317
ISBN (Print)9780367287023
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 1989 Taylor & Francis.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The moral judgment, action, and credibility of Israeli soldiers who refused to serve in Lebanon (1982-1985)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this