Abstract
The past is full of terrible tragedies, including slavery, World War I, and the Holocaust. Morality would clearly appear to support the preference that the victims of those calamities would have lived free and peaceful lives. And yet, a puzzle or even a paradox appears to be lurking here. Moral evaluation can be either personal or impersonal, yet neither one of these two perspectives, nor any other prevalent moral evaluation of events, appears to yield the morally expected conclusion. To the best of my knowledge this puzzle has not been discussed before. If there is no way to escape this surprising conclusion, then morality appears to be much more grim and unsympathetic than we normally think.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 188-201 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Moral Philosophy |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.
Keywords
- Nonidentity problem
- moral paradoxes
- philosophy of history
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy