The Missing-Letter Effect for Common Function Words Depends on Their Linguistic Function in the Phrase

Seth N. Greenberg, Asher Koriat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It has been proposed that function words such as for and on conceal their letters because their higher familiarity allows fast access to their unitized representations. However, in this study we show that letter detection in function words varies with their linguistic role in text. When such words were embedded in a phrase where they were forced into a content role by the surrounding context (e.g., for or against or on switch), letter detection improved markedly and did not differ from that of matched content words. The result was replicated when the context preceding the function word and the overall sentential meaning were equated for both function and content usages. The results support a late-stage structural account of the function-disadvantage effect, where the syntactic units that support the structural frame of a sentence are lost in the transition from structure to meaning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1051-1061
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Missing-Letter Effect for Common Function Words Depends on Their Linguistic Function in the Phrase'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this