The Kurdish emirates: Obstacles or precursors to Kurdish nationalism?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review


The main sociopolitical frameworks in Kurdistan in the premodern era were the tribes and the tribal, quasi-feudal principalities or emirates headed by emirs. Although the Kurdish emirates experienced varying degrees of autonomy, they continued to be vassals of successive Muslim overlords – the Abbasid, Seljuk, Turkmen, Ottoman, and Iranian states and dynasties. From the early sixteenth century, Kurdistan was divided between the two rival regional powers: the Ottoman Empire and the Iranian Safavid Shi'i state. The Ottoman traveler and official Evliya Chelebi and European travelers who visited Bitlis were impressed by the emirate's military strength and economic vitality, and by the extent of its independence, and described it as a burgeoning cultural and religious center. The decline of the emirate of Bitlis allowed the ascent of the emirates of Bahdinan, Baban, Soran and Botan. However, despite their demise, the emirates were undoubtedly significant, alongside tribal and religious identities, in perpetuating a sense of Kurdish distinctiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook on the Kurds
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781317237990
ISBN (Print)9781138646643
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 selection and editorial matter, Michael M. Gunter; individual chapters, the contributors.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'The Kurdish emirates: Obstacles or precursors to Kurdish nationalism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this