The judicial branch in Israel

Menachem Hofnung, Mohammed S. Wattad

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review


The contemporary perception of Israel’s judiciary as an independent branch does not coincide with Israel’s first government’s perception after establishing the first Supreme Court. To a great extent the executive branch deemed the court its long arm. Until the mid-1950s judges were appointed by the government, and questions of conflicts of interest and political affiliation-in the wide sense of the term-were not compelling. However, since the 1990s the court’s power of judicial review and the legitimacy of its decisions have become issues of heated public debate. Consequently, the process of appointing justices to the court has become subject to very strict public and political scrutiny. This chapter asks whether the Israeli judiciary truly constitutes a third independent branch of government. This is relevant considering the continuous attempts to change the existing balance of power, aiming to limit the court’s capacity to apply universal judicial doctrines and legal standards to executive and legislative decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Israeli Politics and Society
PublisherOxford University Press
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9780190675585
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Oxford University Press 2021.


  • Constitution
  • Harari resolution
  • High court of justice
  • Israel
  • Judicial independence
  • Judicial review
  • Judiciary
  • Supreme court

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'The judicial branch in Israel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this