Abstract
Radiocarbon investigations in recent years show beyond doubt that the Iron IIA lasted until approximately 800 B.C.E. The early-to-late Iron IIA transition should be placed in the first half of the ninth century. For the beginning of the Iron IIA (the Iron I/II transition), the differences between the debating camps have now narrowed to a few decades-a gap that is beyond the resolution of radiocarbon results, even when a large number of determinations are deployed. Introducing historical considerations as well as observations related to the pace of change of pottery traditions, the Iron I/II transition could have taken a decade or two and should be put shortly after the midtenth century B.C.E.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 50-54 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Near Eastern Archaeology |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2011 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Archaeology
- History
- Archaeology