Abstract
Israel's policy of military reprisals has never seemed to follow any consistent pattern of tit-for-tat. On the one hand, not every violent incident was answered with a counter-attack. On the other hand, when Israel responded, frequently it employed an excessive amount of force, which was disproportional to the Arab provocation. This behavior has not been the consequence of a premeditated and rational strategy. Instead, it appears to have been the result of a political dispute between alternative approaches regarding the use of military force. The following research analyzes the development of this controversy and how these differences of opinion were resolved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-28 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Journal of Strategic Studies |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of internal politics on Israel's reprisal policy during the 1950s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver