Abstract
Shoham, Rose and Albaum (1995) discussed the Etnocentric, Polycentric, Regiocentric, and Geocentric Framework (EPRG) in the context of a nomological network that also included export motives and psychological distance. Notably, the impact of EPRG orientations on firm performance was not discussed in their study. This article addresses this relationship. We argue that EPRG orientation, in and by itself, should not affect performance. We document empirically that subjective assessments of export performance do not differ on the basis of firms’ EPRG orientations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Developments in Marketing Science |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Pages | 366-371 |
Number of pages | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
Name | Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2363-6165 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2363-6173 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015, Academy of Marketing Science.
Keywords
- Cultural Distance
- Export Performance
- Home Market
- International Performance
- Marketing Strategy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Marketing
- Strategy and Management