Abstract
The theoretical model developed in this paper indicates that a lump-sum subsidy granted to a monopolist facing a binding rate of return constraint will result in a higher level of capital employed and output produced. Furthermore, production costs at any level of output will be higher compared to the pre-subsidy situation. The empirical results emanating from the application of the model to the bus transport sector indicate that lump-sum subsidies have been factor-biased and have led to higher costs as predicted by the model. The average rate of productivity growth has been reduced by 0.60 percentage points per year as a direct result of the lump-sum subsidy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 105-119 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1987 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of lump-sum subsidies on the structure of production and productivity in regulated industries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver