The effect of induced subgraphs on quasi-randomness

Asaf Shapira, Raphael Yuster

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

One of the main questions that arise when studying random and quasi-random structures is which properties P are such that any object that satisfies P "behaves" like a truly random one. In the context of graphs, Chung, Graham, and Wilson[9] call a graph p-quasi-random if it satisfies a long list of the properties that hold in G(n, p) with high probability, like edge distribution, spectral gap, cut size, and more. Our main result here is that the following holds for any fixed graph H: if the distribution of induced copies of H in a graph G is close (in a well defined way) to the distribution we would expect to have in G(n, p), then G is either p-quasi-random or p̄-quasirandom, where p̄ is the unique non-trivial solution of the polynomial equation x δ(1 - x) 1-δ = p δ(1 - p) 1-δ, with δ being the edge density of H. We thus infer that having the correct distribution of induced copies of any single graph H, is enough to guarantee that a graph has the properties of a random one. The proof techniques we develop here, which combine probabilistic, algebraic and combinatorial tools, may be of independent interest to the study of quasi-random structures.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Pages789-798
Number of pages10
StatePublished - 2008
Event19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms - San Francisco, CA, United States
Duration: 20 Jan 200822 Jan 2008

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

Conference

Conference19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Francisco, CA
Period20/01/0822/01/08

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • General Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of induced subgraphs on quasi-randomness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this