The Development of Sensitivity to Grammatical Violations in American Sign Language: Native Versus Nonnative Signers

Rama Novogrodsky, Jon Henner, Catherine Caldwell-Harris, Robert Hoffmeister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Factors influencing native and nonnative signers’ syntactic judgment ability in American Sign Language (ASL) were explored for 421 deaf students aged 7;6–18;5. Predictors for syntactic knowledge were chronological age, age of entering a school for the deaf, gender, and additional learning disabilities. Mixed-effects linear modeling analysis revealed main effects of each predictor and an interaction between signing status and learning disability. The native signers showed typical syntactic development that varied by chronological age, gender, additional learning disabilities, and age of entering a deaf school. In contrast, the syntactic development of nonnative signers was more variable. It was less tightly related to chronological age and more strongly influenced by the age at which they had entered the school where assessment occurred, which was highly related to length of exposure to a sign language.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)791-818
Number of pages28
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan

Keywords

  • ASL
  • assessment
  • deaf
  • sign language
  • syntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Development of Sensitivity to Grammatical Violations in American Sign Language: Native Versus Nonnative Signers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this