The assessment of microbial biomass C in subsoil samples using fumigation-extraction is negligibly affected by residual chloroform

Nativ Rotbart, Mikhail Borisover, Nadezhda Bukhanovsky, Anna Beriozkin, Gil Eshel, Asher Bar-Tal, Adi Oren

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Debate

Abstract

The potential overestimation of soil microbial biolmass C, using the fumigation-extraction method, arising from the contribution of residual (i.e., non-evacuated) chloroform (CHCl3) to the fumigation flush of C, was recently shown to be minor for agricultural topsoil samples. However, we hypothesized larger flush proportions of residual CHCl3–C, and hence greater biomass overestimations in low-biomass, subsoil samples due to the characteristically lower fumigation flushes of C in subsoils. The depth stratification (0–100 cm) of fumigation-extractable C and CHCl3–C was determined in six soil profiles (three loesses ranging from 6 to 20% clay and three vertisols ranging from 46 to 69% clay). Residual chloroform levels correlated positively with soil organic matter content but not with clay content and decreased down the profiles. Residual chloroform contributed ∼2.0% to biomass-C overestimation, independent of soil type or depth, thus refuting the study hypothesis and supporting the safe use of the fumigation-extraction method also with subsoil samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)474-482
Number of pages9
JournalArid Land Research and Management
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Keywords

  • Chloroform fumigation-extraction
  • clay content
  • extractable chloroform
  • microbial biomass overestimation
  • organic matter content
  • soil depth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The assessment of microbial biomass C in subsoil samples using fumigation-extraction is negligibly affected by residual chloroform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this