That’s Optional: A Contemporary Exploration of "that" Omission in English Subordinate Clauses

Ella Rabinovich

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis posits that speakers optimize the communicative properties of their utterances by avoiding spikes in information, thereby maintaining a relatively uniform information profile over time. This paper investigates the impact of UID principles on syntactic reduction, specifically focusing on the optional omission of the connector "that" in English subordinate clauses. Building upon previous research, we extend our investigation to a larger corpus of written English, utilize contemporary large language models (LLMs) and extend the information-uniformity principles by the notion of entropy, to estimate the UID manifestations in the use-case of syntactic reduction choices.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationShort Papers
EditorsLun-Wei Ku, Andre F. T. Martins, Vivek Srikumar
PublisherAssociation for Computational Linguistics (ACL)
Pages378-385
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9798891760950
StatePublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes
Event62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024 - Bangkok, Thailand
Duration: 11 Aug 202416 Aug 2024

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Volume2
ISSN (Print)0736-587X

Conference

Conference62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2024
Country/TerritoryThailand
CityBangkok
Period11/08/2416/08/24

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Association for Computational Linguistics.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'That’s Optional: A Contemporary Exploration of "that" Omission in English Subordinate Clauses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this