Abstract
This paper examines the faulty assumption that the difficulty of a multiple-choice comprehension test depends mainly on the difficulty of the text. Instead, the basic assumption stated in this paper is that the difficulty of a multiple-choice test depends on two components, a text and questions, with results varying according to the level of English proficiency of the students tested. Two multiple-choice comprehension tests on the advanced level were administered: one based on a relatively easy text, the other on a more difficult one. The difficulty of the texts was measured by teacher evaluation and by discourse analysis. For each text, nine multiple-choice questions are examined. Test 1 was administered to 178 candidates, and Test 2 to 132. The two tests show no significant differences in scores, despite the fact that one of the texts is clearly easier. The results indicate that teachers/test-constructors cannot assume that a text of a particular level of difficulty will automatically yield questions reflecting the level of the text.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 285-290 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | System |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1982 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Education
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the test of advanced EFL reading comprehension: To what extent does the difficulty of a multiple-choice comprehension test reflect the difficulty of the text?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver