Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Territorial Rights and the Debate About the Morality of Zionism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the view that, beyond particular wrongs committed by Zionism, the Zionist project was itself inherently wrong. I argue that the most plausible basis for this claim is the contention that Zionism disrespected the territorial rights of the local Arab population. By examining leading contemporary theories of territorial rights – specifically those of Miller Moore and Stilz – I demonstrate that none provide a strong foundation for this view. At the onset of Zionist immigration, the Arabs of Palestine did not meet the criteria required to possess territorial rights under these theoretical frameworks.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPhilosophy and Public Affairs
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Philosophy & Public Affairs published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keywords

  • Zionism
  • colonialism
  • territorial rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Territorial Rights and the Debate About the Morality of Zionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this