Abstract
This article examines the paradox of territorial control among revolutionary violent non-state actors, that view territorial gains as a means to advance their agenda rather than an end goal. While territorial control can provide safe havens, operational advantages, and legitimacy, it exposes them to countermeasures, governance burdens, and compromises. This study investigates the conditions under which territorial control emboldens revolutionary VNSAs to attack state actors and pursue their goals, and when it undermines their objectives, by comparing ISIS, Hezbollah, Hamas, and HTS. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of insurgent strategy and the trade-offs of territorial control.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Sociology and Political Science
- Safety Research
- Political Science and International Relations