Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a philosophical defense for targeted killings in the wars against terror. The paper argues that if one accepts the moral legitimacy of the large-scale killing of combatants in conventional (what are soon to be called "old-fashioned") wars, one cannot object - on moral grounds - to the targeted killing of terrorists in wars against terror. If one rejects this legitimacy, one must object to all killing in war, targeted and non-targeted alike, and thus not support the view, which is criticized here, that targeted killings are particularly disturbing from a moral point of view.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 7 |
| Pages (from-to) | 180-198 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Theoretical Inquiries in Law |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2004 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Law