Studium and Punctum in psychoanalytic writing: Reading case studies through roland barthes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper focuses on the link between Roland Barthes’s reflection on photography and the essential characteristics of psychoanalytic case studies. The case study, like the photograph, seeks to take hold of something nearly intangible. It attempts to capture in time, space, and language something whose dynamic presence remains elusive. The attempt to capture this object often strips it of its essence. Case studies may be accurate on their face while giving us the unpleasant sense that they have “deadened” their object in the process. This paper attempts to clarify what is dropped from the picture that the psychoanalytic writing is trying to take. The relation between the “cultural context” (the Studium) and the freedom to puncture and undermine this context in psychoanalytic writing is discussed through a fresh reading of Georges Perec’s “W, or the Memory of Childhood” and through clinical vignettes by Ronald Britton and Michael Eigen.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-65
Number of pages15
JournalPsychoanalytic Review
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 N.P.A.P.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Studium and Punctum in psychoanalytic writing: Reading case studies through roland barthes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this