Abstract
In this study we examine the effect of gender variations in social capital and networking modes on performance evaluations. We drawupon social capital theory and the contrast between a “gendered” vs. a “performative” modeling of women’s work behavior to examine the effect of gender differences in (a) use of homophily -ascribed / achieved-ties and (b) networking -consulting / sharing- modes on performance evaluations. The results from a sample of 135 men and women CEOs indicate that the sharing networking mode has positive effects on performance evaluations for both men and women CEOs, but women, report a negative effect of homophily ties. The results support the assumptions developed in the “performative” hypothesis suggesting that gender is not a “feature” of women CEOs’ behavior in the workplace
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-108 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Social Capital, Homophily Ties and Networking Modes: A Gendered Approach to Ceos Evaluations of Organizational Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver