Sex Ambiguity in Early Modern Common Law (1629-1787)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Prior to the modern understanding of sex as fundamentally biological, a person's sex status - that is, whether they were male or female - was largely a legal issue. How was this legal fact established in cases of doubt? To answer that question, this article tells the story of the regulation of cases of doubtful sex (the cases of people who were then referred to as hermaphrodites) between 1629 and 1787 in England and Colonial America. Trials of doubtful sex from this period show that, rather than being based on a single piece of evidence (such as genital appearance), determining a person's sex required a rich and context-sensitive evaluation by witnesses and juries. However, toward the end of the eighteenth century, scientific and medical authorities gradually sought to classify hermaphrodites according to their true sex and to remove any doubt from that classification. Ultimately, this article demonstrates that the early modern common law tradition did not conceptualize sex as purely binary and did not hinge on medical opinions throughout most of the eighteenth century. These findings highlight the continuous engagement of courts in actively shaping the meaning and ontology of sex rather than merely reflecting it in their decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-513
Number of pages36
JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the ISRAEL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (grant No. 704/21).

Publisher Copyright:
©

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (all)
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Ambiguity in Early Modern Common Law (1629-1787)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this