Abstract
States’ right to exclude prospective members is the subject of a fierce debate in political theory, but the right to include has received relatively little scholarly attention. To address this lacuna, we examine the puzzle of permissible inclusion: when may states confer citizenship on individuals they have no prior obligation to include? We first clarify why permissible inclusion is a puzzle, then proceed to a normative evaluation of this practice and its limits. We investigate self-determination – a dominant principle in theories of the right to exclude – as a normative ground for limits on the right to include. We argue that states’ duties to respect one another’s self-determination yield limits on permissible inclusion. When inclusive policies for citizenship undermine the permissible scope of self-determination of other states, they are impermissible; they should either be prohibited, or require compensation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 753-769 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Political Studies |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- citizenship
- exclusion and inclusion
- naturalisation
- permissible scope
- political membership
- self-determination
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Self-Determination and the Limits on the Right to Include'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver