Selective exposure, political polarization, and possible mediators: Evidence from the Netherlands

Damian Trilling, Marijn Van Klingeren, Yariv Tsfati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


One of the main lines of reasoning in the contemporary debate on media effects is the notion that selective exposure to congruent information can lead to political polarization. Most studies are correlational, potentially plagued with self-report biases, and cannot demonstrate time order. Even less is known about the mechanisms behind such an effect. We conducted an online quasi-experiment with a sample matching the characteristics of the Dutch population closely (N = 501). We investigate how selective exposure can lead to polarized attitudes and which role frames, facts, and public opinion cues play. While we find that facts learned can help explaining attitude change and that selectivity can influence the perception of public opinion, we cannot confirm that people generally polarize.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-213
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Selective exposure, political polarization, and possible mediators: Evidence from the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this