Secular nationalism vs. religious Pan-Islamism: the positions of the state and ulema in Iran on the Question of Palestine, 1947-1979

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Pahlavi regime and the Shiite ulema in Iran did not see the Question of Palestine eye to eye. This was much the result of the regime’s secular-nationalist perspective compared to ulema’s religious and pan-Islamic one. While the regime made symbolic gestures and lip service to the Palestinian cause, the ulema provided moral and practical support, which even included fundraising and enlisting Iranian volunteers to be sent to Palestine. In reality, contrary to the Iranian Shiite ulema who sought the destruction of the nascent Jewish state, the Shah saw much benefit in a rapprochement with Israel, which increased over time and gradually led to Iranian-Israeli strategic partnership. It was only after the overthrow of the Shah and the establishment of the Islamic Republic that the ulema could freely and fully support the Palestinian cause and the Palestinian struggle against Israel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-64
Number of pages19
JournalIsrael Affairs
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • 1948-49 Palestine War
  • Ayatollah Abu al-Qasim Kashani
  • Iran
  • Iran–Israel relations
  • Islamic Revolution
  • Israel
  • Jews
  • Mohammed Riza Shah Pahlavi
  • Palestine
  • Shiite ulema
  • antisemitism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Secular nationalism vs. religious Pan-Islamism: the positions of the state and ulema in Iran on the Question of Palestine, 1947-1979'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this