Abstract
Some 180 desert kites were reported from Armenia, with puzzling aspects regarding the typological variability and distribution patterns. Although the study of kites in southwest Asia has made many recent advances, their dating and cultural context remain uncertain due to apparent limitations. A division of them includes two major categories, v-shaped hunting kites, and enclosure kites. The latter have two subgroups: those with and those lacking guiding walls. Here, we analyze the architectural characteristics and geographical settings of v-shaped and enclosure kites in order to shed new light on their past function. It appears that the rare v-shaped kites are limited to the topographical lower end of the kites’ phenomenon in Armenia. On the other hand, the enclosure kites are found across the topographical range of the phenomenon, between about 900 and 1500 m above msl. Furthermore, the typical Armenian enclosure kite has a heart-like morphology, with trapping pits located upwards and ‘behind’ the main entrance of the enclosure. Such a layout is uncommon further south in the deserts of the Near East, but documented for game traps on the Ustyurt Plateau, and similar structures were used for hunting and herding in Scandinavia. We thus suggest that the two Armenian enclosure kite types were used for hunting wild game, most likely Red Deer (with guiding walls); and for keeping livestock (without guiding walls). We also suggest that the hunters and/or herders that constructed the kites practiced seasonal vertical movement between winter and summer grazing lands.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 285-304 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Quaternary International |
Volume | 464 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 10 Jan 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This paper and our work in Armenia follow our Negev Desert Kites Project initiated almost 10 years ago; we were indeed inspired by Mina's dual work on archaeological and cultural landscapes. We all feel that we brought to this project a large battery of conceptual and methodological approaches that was influenced by Mina's work. We would like to thank the director of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Pavel Avetisyan, for his long-standing support. This research is supported the Gfoeller Revival Foundation of America. We kindly thank Harutyun Achemyan and Armen Asryan in Armenia for their dedicated and professional work carrying out the aerial photography. We also thank Rezmik Asatryan for his generous assistance and hospitality. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Appendix A
Funding Information:
This paper and our work in Armenia follow our Negev Desert Kites Project initiated almost 10 years ago; we were indeed inspired by Mina's dual work on archaeological and cultural landscapes. We all feel that we brought to this project a large battery of conceptual and methodological approaches that was influenced by Mina's work. We would like to thank the director of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, Pavel Avetisyan, for his long-standing support. This research is supported the Gfoeller Revival Foundation of America. We kindly thank Harutyun Achemyan and Armen Asryan in Armenia for their dedicated and professional work carrying out the aerial photography. We also thank Rezmik Asatryan for his generous assistance and hospitality. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA
Keywords
- Armenia
- Enclosures
- Game traps
- Livestock
- Red deer
- Seasonality
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth-Surface Processes