Abstract
This study examined whether mental health community service users completed outcome self-reports differently when assessments were supervised by internal vs. external staff. The examination of potential differences between the two has useful implications for mental health systems that take upon themselves the challenge of Routine Outcome Measurement (ROM), as it might impact allocation of public resources and managed care program planning. 73 consumers completed the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA), a shortened version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS), and a functioning questionnaire. Questionnaires were administered, once using support provided by internal staff and once using support provided by external professional staff, with a one-month time interval and in random order. A MANOVA Repeated Measures showed no differences in outcomes of quality of life and recovery between internal and external support. Functioning scores were higher for the internal support when the internal assessments were performed first. Overall, except for the differences in functioning assessment, outcome scores were not determined by the supporting agency. This might indicate that when measuring quality of life and recovery, different supporting methods can be used to gather outcome measures and internal staff might be a good default agency to do this. Differences found in functioning assessment are discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-46 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Evaluation and Program Planning |
Volume | 50 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jun 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords
- Assessment biases
- Internal vs. external assessment
- Mental health assessments
- Mental health services
- Outcome measurement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Business and International Management
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Strategy and Management
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health