Abstract
Each of the four cities considered in this study-Philadelphia, Gerasa, Bostra, and Philippopolis-presents its own individual urban growth and development. The specific planning of each city and the forces that formed their different urban natures are addressed. Particular stress is placed on the original planning solutions put to use within them, compared to the traditional forms then dominant. By outlining the urban architectural factors these cities had in common, it can be seen that the cities still embody architectural forms similar to one another, despite developmental, cultural, and historical differences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 108-121 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1981 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Architecture
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- History
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Roman Cities in the Province of Arabia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver